Buccal Fat Removal: Does It Give You Cheekbones, or Make You Look Older Later?

Is buccal fat removal worth it if you want a sharper, more sculpted face? For a small group of people with truly full lower cheeks, it can work and most are happy in the short term. For most people who ask for it, it is the wrong fix. The fat it removes is the same fat your face loses on its own as you age, it cannot be put back the same way, and nobody has good long term data on how these faces look 20 years later. Here is what the studies show, what patients say, and how to tell if you are a real candidate.

What the surgery is

The buccal fat pad is a deep pocket of fat in each cheek, between the cheekbone and the jaw. Suck your cheeks in and the hollow you see is roughly where it sits. A surgeon makes a small cut inside the mouth, pulls out some or all of the pad, and stitches it closed. It is a short surgery, and in a large 2026 study it was done with only local numbing. The goal is a hollow under the cheekbone, the "model" shadow.

A few facts most people do not hear:

The pads grow until about age 20, then shrink. Each one holds about 7 to 11 mL. Like other face fat, they get smaller and drop lower with age, which is part of why many round young faces look leaner later without any surgery.
Most fullness is not buccal fat. One well known face surgeon said that for every five patients who ask for buccal fat removal, only one really needs it. The rest have a full face from other fat, a big chewing muscle (masseter), a weak jaw, or body fat.
In men, taking too much can make the face look softer. A dermatologist writing on the procedure warned that overdone removal in men can feminize the face, the opposite of what most looksmaxxers want.

What the research says

Short term, it is usually safe and people like it. A June 2026 review in Facial Plastic Surgery pooled 10 studies and 1,123 patients. Satisfaction was high and complications showed up in 4.2% of 921 procedures, mostly minor. But the authors said long term results were "poorly assessed" because follow up was short. One study reported a gaunt look in 1.6%.
Other counts are much higher. A 2025 review in the Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery found some kind of complication in about 1 in 4 patients (81 of 308). The most common problems were swelling, trouble opening the mouth, pain, and uneven cheeks. Facial nerve weakness, infection, and blood pockets were rare. The authors said it "should be recommended with caution."
The listed risks are real surgery risks. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons lists bleeding, fluid or blood collecting under the skin, infection, injury to the salivary duct, injury to facial nerve branches that can cause temporary or permanent weakness, numbness, asymmetry, long swelling, and the chance you need a second surgery.
The aging worry has a basis. Surgeons who studied the pad in cadavers found that if someone "pulls a little too hard," they can very quickly remove more than they should, and whatever is left keeps shrinking. As one put it: "20 years from now, you may look too thinned out and prematurely aged." International surgeon guidelines say it is generally not for people with naturally thin faces or real age related volume loss.

New research and numbers (June to October 2026)

Demand is falling. The ISAPS global survey released September 29, 2026 counted about 173,562 buccal fat removals worldwide in 2025, down 24.4% from about 229,688 in 2024. About 32,546 were in the US. Surgeons quoted in June 2026 said many patients now regret the "skeletonized" look, and one said "what looks striking at 25 can look gaunt at 45."
A surprising twist on full removal (October 12, 2026). A study of 302 patients (90 men) in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery found only 6 had a blood or fluid pocket after surgery, about 2%. Every one of them was on a side where the pad was only partly removed. None happened after full removal, and none needed another operation. Satisfaction at 6 months was 96%. The catch: this was one clinic, six months of follow up, and it measured early bleeding, not how the face ages. So it says full removal may be cleaner in the short run. It says nothing about whether you will look hollow at 45, which is the main reason most surgeons prefer partial removal.
The nerve is closer than you think (August 11, 2026). A cadaver study in Aesthetic Surgery Journal mapped the buccal nerve, which gives feeling to the inner cheek, and found it runs in a tight corridor right between parts of the fat pad. The authors wrote the map to help surgeons avoid numbness after these procedures.
Some surgeons now lift the pad instead of removing it (June 30, 2026). Another Aesthetic Surgery Journal paper argued that a sagging buccal pad is part of how the middle of the face ages, and described pulling it back up during a facelift to rebuild a youthful cheek. In other words, the same fat young people pay to remove, older patients pay to keep in place.
Weight loss drugs make this worse. An October 14, 2026 review of GLP-1 face changes estimated about 7% loss of midface volume for every 10 kg of weight lost. If you are on or planning to use these drugs, your face is already losing the volume buccal fat removal takes out.

What people who tried it say

These are summaries of real posts from 2026, most from October.

Uneven and hollow. One person said that about seven months after surgery the doctor had taken much more from one side, and that side now looks gaunt and hollow. They asked if fat grafting could fix it. A reply said fat grafting is a common fix for uneven results.
"I got exactly what I asked for" and still regret it. A July post called itself a cautionary tale: the surgery did what was planned, but it hollowed the cheeks more than expected and aged the face. The poster begged people on the fence to "think twice" and asked about volume restoring treatments.
Years later, a cascade. A 37 year old woman said the reduction she had in 2023 alongside a nose job "changed my face dramatically," and she now has sagging, flat cheeks, under eye hollows, and a gaunt look. She is weighing fillers, fat grafting, or a midface lift.
Nobody knows the long run. A 26 year old who had it a year ago asked women over 40 how theirs aged. The main reply: the procedure is popular mostly with young people, so they are "kinda mostly the guinea pigs."
"They settled a lot after 30." A 19 year old asked if buccal fat removal was the best way to slim her cheeks. One woman replied that she had very chubby cheeks at that age and even bit them to look gaunt, but they settled a lot on their own after 30 and she now loves them. Others said the cheeks were not that full and that a set back chin can make cheeks look rounder than they are.
Partial still works for very full cheeks. Someone with very full lower cheeks chose partial removal because of the regret stories and still saw a big difference. Another commenter answering a person who wanted full removal said the procedure is "almost never a good idea for most people."
Wrong fat, wrong fix. A person wanting a more masculine, angular face said surgeons recommended chin surgery, and one also suggested buccal fat removal. A commenter pointed out the roundness sat on top of the cheekbones, not below them, so buccal fat removal would not fix it. They suggested chin filler first to test the look, and argued that reaching a lower body fat might get the look without surgery.

Lesser-known tips

Look at your parents. One surgeon tells patients to look at their mom, dad, and grandparents. If they still have round faces in their 50s and 60s, you might be a fit. If they got lean or hollow with age, your face will likely do the same without help.
Get lean first. If you have body fat to lose, lose it before judging your face. Fat loss slims the whole face, and the buccal pads shrink with age anyway.
Rule out the jaw muscle. If your face is wide at the angle of the jaw, the cause may be the masseter, not cheek fat. Removing buccal fat will not change that.
Ask for partial, in writing. Almost every surgeon who warns about this procedure says reduce, do not remove. Ask how much they plan to take from each side and how they will keep it even.
Know the undo is not clean. Fixes include fat grafting, fillers, and lifts. Grafted fat is living tissue, so one surgeon warned it can grow or shrink if your weight changes later. None of these perfectly rebuilds what was taken.
Suck in your cheeks in photos first. It is free and shows roughly the hollow you would get. If you like that look only in some lighting, surgery will not make it look better in all lighting.

Our honest take

What supporters get right: For some people with heavy lower cheeks that stay full even when lean, partial removal is a quick surgery that can make a real difference, and short term satisfaction in studies is high.

What they leave out: The studies are small and short, complication rates range from about 2% to 25% depending on how you count, the 1 in 5 "real candidate" estimate means most people asking should not get it, and the main risk, looking older and gaunt in your 40s, is the one no study has tracked yet. Global demand dropped by about a quarter in one year, which tells you something about how the trend aged.

Bottom line

Buccal fat removal is a niche fix that got sold as a shortcut to cheekbones. If you are young, already lean, thin faced, or on weight loss drugs, the odds favor regret later. If your cheeks stay round even at a low body fat and your family keeps full faces into old age, a conservative partial removal by an experienced surgeon is a reasonable option. Before you remove anything permanent, it helps to know how your face reads to other people as it is. The Face They See lets people of the opposite gender rank your photos for free, so you can see whether round cheeks are actually what is holding you back.

Related guides

See all guides